AW: [jwt-dev] JWT metamodel extension spec

["Florian Lautenbacher" <florian.lautenbacher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Marc,

thanks for your detailed description about the requirements and goals for
metamodel extensions and for the differences of the existing possibilities.
Especially the aspects sound very interesting for me. However, I still
didn't completely understand them. Maybe you could provide some code
snippets either on Bugzilla or on the Wiki, so we can understand how they
should be implemented. Since I have no experience with Dynamic EMF, I can't
say anything about the performance issues, but it sounds good as well as the
XSD-possibility.
Looking forward to see some code in order to get a better insight and to
assist you a little bit more in this area. Maybe also some diagrams would
help us to understand your thoughts better...

Best regards,

Florian 

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: jwt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jwt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im
Auftrag von Marc Dutoo
Gesendet: 19 May 2008 16:55
An: Java Workflow Toolbox
Betreff: [jwt-dev] JWT metamodel extension spec

Hi all

I've written about JWT metamodel extension specifications at the bottom of
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php?title=JWT_Metamodel , mainly on
   * "goals" : summarize all JWT members' goal for such extensions. 
Obviously everyone's welcome for giving some feedback !
   * "design" : summarize my latest tries at hacking the JWT WE metamodel
and writing sample extensions. I've still to upload the actual stuff as a
bugzilla.

To make it short, for now what I like is an "aspects" relation on
ModelElement (or at least Action) to an "Aspect" dynamic interface, and
dynamic EMF extensions. I've also tried simple properties.

Feedback welcome !

Regards,
Marc
_______________________________________________
jwt-dev mailing list
jwt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jwt-dev