[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
AW: [jwt-dev] [jwt-users] and the road goes on...
|
Hi Fabrice,
>>The need for a BPMN notation seems to be important
for a few people.
Do you
mean that BPMN is only important for SOME people, or that it is important for
MANY people? As you know currently the representation in AgilPro is in somehow
similar to BPMN and can be easily adapted to show only BPMN symbols, but the
metamodel behind that is not equal to the one from BPMN - so that might need
many changes to adapt that...
>> In fact what is
important I think is to have the ability to use JWT as top-down tool as so as a
bottom-up tool.
I hope
that Marc and the other partners from the SCoRWARE project can provide some
insight knowledge how especially to integrate existing services, etc. bottom-up
into the process models.
>> to start from a more business modeling
view (typically BPMN) and then switch from this view to a more technical
view.
Currently this can be done in AgilPro by switching the parameters in the
menu. Of course this could also be done in different tabs, but I guess that
different people need different views, so configuring that in the preferences
seems to make more sense in my eyes...
Considering the different representations: currently it is only possible
to have the same graphical presentation, but this should be extended in further
version.
What
is currently possible is a refinement of business processes in the more
technical view. So you can have a business process in the business view with A
-> B -> C, and in the technical view with A1 -> A2 -> A3 -> B
-> C1 -> C2 -> C3 || C4 -> C5 or something like
that...
Best
regards,
Florian
