[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [jta-dev] CDI interceptors should marked the transaction for rollback for unchecked exceptions not only for RuntimeExceptions
|
Also, does anyone have an opinion if this should be a version 3 of the specification or version 2.1 would be OK? I am thinking given there could be some backwards compatibility implication for implementations then perhaps this would prompt it to be appropriate to rev to version 3?
I am writing to raise awareness of an outstanding issue that was raised earlier this year:
And has a pull request for it:
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jta-api/pull/192
Would anyone disagree with such a change being added to Jakarta Transactions?
The implication for me is that some implementations which may not have previously been dealing with java.lang.Error unchecked exception classes in the same way as java.lang.RuntimeException would become in-compliant with the specification.
Many thanks,
Tom
