[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [jgit-dev] version numbers
- From: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 12:09:27 +0200
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=UONhMfz7CgpqNFjbkj0c+4cC6ecdAMSFJkrj24abGkxr5EEPTLoFuiLOS5gGRdm0TU y4QmEk0YpKAO7qoIhwq5oLVtEO3EW9wJTFi88AekenX8LWEs2awDE0WcMeemJG96pIK8 SGJ5XrJRk5dwd49GMTudgUJK1uggek3JRzd04=
2010/5/5 Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
onsdagen den 5 maj 2010 02.11.33 skrev Matthias Sohn:
Since versions are so complicated I think we should have the discussion
> OK, let's do it this way, this looks like the best compromise.
before decisions, rather than after.
This wasn't meant as a decision but just my personal 2 ct about Shawn's proposal.
I still feel this is not a nice solution but I don't have a better one.