Re: [jgit-dev] version numbers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [jgit-dev] version numbers

From: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 12:09:27 +0200
Delivered-to: jgit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=UONhMfz7CgpqNFjbkj0c+4cC6ecdAMSFJkrj24abGkxr5EEPTLoFuiLOS5gGRdm0TU y4QmEk0YpKAO7qoIhwq5oLVtEO3EW9wJTFi88AekenX8LWEs2awDE0WcMeemJG96pIK8 SGJ5XrJRk5dwd49GMTudgUJK1uggek3JRzd04=
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/jgit-dev>
List-help: <mailto:jgit-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jgit-dev>, <mailto:jgit-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jgit-dev>, <mailto:jgit-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

2010/5/5 Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@xxxxxxxxxx>

onsdagen den 5 maj 2010 02.11.33 skrev Matthias Sohn:

>
> OK, let's do it this way, this looks like the best compromise.

Since versions are so complicated I think we should have the discussion
before decisions, rather than after.

This wasn't meant as a decision but just my personal 2 ct about Shawn's proposal.

I still feel this is not a nice solution but I don't have a better one.

--
Matthias

References:
- [jgit-dev] version numbers
  - From: Matthias Sohn
- Re: [jgit-dev] version numbers
  - From: Robin Rosenberg

Prev by Date: Re: [egit-dev] Re: [jgit-dev] version numbers
Next by Date: Re: [egit-dev] Re: [jgit-dev] version numbers
Previous by thread: Re: [egit-dev] Re: [jgit-dev] version numbers
Next by thread: [jgit-dev] Version numbers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs