Re: [jetty-users] Which version to use for new development?

[Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx>]

Jetty9 source code has been released alongside the artifacts so
depending how you are using eclipse you should be fine.  I use the
maven integration and have no issues, it just downloads the artifact
if needs to display some source for it.

regardless, it is the same setup as jetty8 in maven central

jesse

--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx


On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:02 PM, ccleve <ccleve.tech@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Decided not to use jetty-maven-plugin. We do need jetty-start, though.
>
> Also -- with Jetty 9, when there is an exception within the Jetty 9 source
> code, clicking on the stack trace in Eclipse yields a "line number not
> found" error, and it doesn't find the source. Might have been compiled
> without line numbers.
>
> Going back to Jetty 8 until the next milestone release is out.
>
>
>
> On 10/24/2012 11:50 AM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
>>
>> That will released in the next milestone, in a week or so.
>>
>> On Oct 24, 2012 11:45 AM, "ccleve"
>> <ccleve.tech@xxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:ccleve.tech@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>>     Thanks, we're trying to use Jetty 9.
>>
>>     One difficulty: the jetty-maven-plugin for 9 is not in the maven
>>     repo, which makes debugging hard.
>>
>>
>>
>>     On 10/19/2012 3:53 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
>>
>>         We are releasing jetty9 milestones with the intent of the first
>>         stable
>>         release by the end of the year.  So by our estimation you should
>> be
>>         fine, however if you want to play it safe then jetty8 would be
>> fine.
>>
>>         FWIW, any issues you may find between now and then would have a
>>         definiate priority in terms of being addressed :)
>>
>>         cheers,
>>         jesse
>>
>>         --
>>         jesse mcconnell
>>         jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx
>>         <mailto:jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>>
>>         On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:50 PM, ccleve
>>         <ccleve.tech@xxxxxxxxx
>>         <mailto:ccleve.tech@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>>             I'm starting to developing an app that will do much
>>             asynchronous passing of
>>             messages. I'd like to use HttpClient. It seems that Jetty 9
>>             is much improved
>>             and would be a better choice than Jetty 8.
>>
>>             Here's the rub: the app needs to go into production before
>>             the end of the
>>             year, and Jetty 9 hasn't been released.
>>
>>             Should I use Jetty 9 or Jetty 8? How stable is 9?
>>
>>             _________________________________________________
>>             jetty-users mailing list
>>             jetty-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>             <mailto:jetty-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>             https://dev.eclipse.org/__mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
>>             <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _________________________________________________
>>     jetty-users mailing list
>>     jetty-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>     <mailto:jetty-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>     https://dev.eclipse.org/__mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
>>
>>     <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jetty-users mailing list
>> jetty-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jetty-users mailing list
> jetty-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users