On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 23:51, Matthew Painter
<
matthew.painter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi All,
> Firstly, apologies for the cross-posting; I posted in dev first, but this is
> probably more suitable :)
> I am running a Jetty RT application behind an EC2 HTTPS load balancer:
> Client --HTTPS--> balancer --HTTP--> Jetty
>
> Say I have a context foo, and someone makes the request:
>
https://mydomain.com/foo
> You would expect a redirect to
https://mydomain.com/foo/, but instead you
> have a redirect to
http://mydomain.com/foo/ - which breaks the app.
> I have had a google around about this, but can't find anything Jetty
> specific... can anyone shed any light on any work-arounds or fixes for this?
> I presume that as the request is being made over http, jetty is assuming
> that that is the protocol for the redirect, instead of using the actual
> protocol?
> Thanks :)
>
> Matt
> _____________________________________________________________________
> The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended
> for the addressee only. If you have received this message in error, please
> notify Kusiri Limited as soon as possible. The unauthorised use, disclosure,
> copying or alteration of this message is prohibited and may be unlawful. The
> internet cannot guarantee the integrity of this message and therefore Kusiri
> Limited will not be liable for the message if modified.
>
> Matthew Painter - Kusiri
> Chief Technology Officer
>
> 5 New Street
> London
> EC2M 4TP
> United Kingdom
>
> Telephone:
+44 (0) 781 321 4728
> Email:
matthew.painter@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended
> for the addressee only. If you have received this message in error, please
> notify Kusiri Limited as soon as possible. The unauthorised use, disclosure,
> copying or alteration of this message is prohibited and may be unlawful. The
> internet cannot guarantee the integrity of this message and therefore Kusiri
> Limited will not be liable for the message if modified.
>
