[jetty-dev] Re: osgi manifest review

[Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx>]

hm, oh ya under osgi versioning it would be [1.5,2.0)

right...

think I was just being intolerant of having that much faith across
version changes

jesse

--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx



On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 19:56, Jeff McAffer <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ok.  is there a reason why you narrowed the range for SLF?
>
> Jeff
>
> Jesse McConnell wrote:
>>
>> Jeff,
>>
>> I have the following generating now...I think this is what we are looking
>> for :)
>>
>> Import-Package: org.eclipse.jetty.util;version="[7.0,8.0)",org.eclipse
>>  .jetty.util.ajax;version="[7.0,8.0)",org.eclipse.jetty.util.component
>>  ;version="[7.0,8.0)",org.eclipse.jetty.util.log;version="[7.0,8.0)",o
>>  rg.eclipse.jetty.util.resource;version="[7.0,8.0)",org.eclipse.jetty.
>>  util.thread;version="[7.0,8.0)",org.slf4j;version="[1.5,1.6)",resolut
>>  ion:=optional
>>
>> cheers,
>> jesse
>>
>> --
>> jesse mcconnell
>> jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 14:42, Jeff McAffer <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> You are going to force me to join jetty-dev...
>>>
>>> On a different note, the import package version ranges should eventually
>>> have an upper bound.  As it is you are saying you will  work fine with
>>> version 10 of, for exampel, org.eclipse.jetty.http.  Perhaps but that is
>>> a
>>> tall order to say up front.  Given that we went for years without import
>>> versions at all, this is something you can address later.
>>>
>>>
>>> what would this look like and I'll see about getting that addressed
>>> sooner rather then later..
>>>
>>>
>>> given the version number semantics we use
>>>    http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Version_Numbering
>>> most dependencies are spec'd with an upper bound that is one higher than
>>> the
>>> major of the lower and non-inclusive.  That is, 8.0 is not expected to be
>>> binary compatible with 7.0 so a dependency on something in 7.x should be
>>> [7.<whatever is the lowest you need>, 8.0.0)
>>>
>>> Note the ')' at the end.  that is non-inclusive of 8.0.0.  So everything
>>> from the lower bound up to but not including 8.0.0.
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>>
>>>
>