Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jersey-dev] [External] : How To Use Jersey Client Efficiently

The thing is that the services are user-defined and not known by the
system in advance.

More specifically, the users can create SPARQL services with optional
HTTP Basic authentication, and then query them.

On Tue, Jan 6, 2026 at 12:09 PM Jan Supol <jan.supol@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Is it an issue to keep multiple clients, one per each service-specific auth needs?
> --Jan
>
> Confidential- Oracle Internal
> ________________________________
> From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, January 5, 2026 12:20 PM
> To: Jan Supol <jan.supol@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: jersey developer discussions <jersey-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [External] : [jersey-dev] How To Use Jersey Client Efficiently
>
> Thanks Jan, good to know.
>
> How do you recommend implementing these seemingly conflicting requirements then?
> - reusing Client instances
> - supplying service-specific auth credentials to different services
>
> Martynas
>
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2026 at 7:52 PM Jan Supol <jan.supol@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Martynas,
> > Yes, this is still the same. When a WebTarget instance gets initialized - before the request, a costly injection framework (HK2) instance is created. Each feature is registered into the injection framework and to ensure the separation of features between the WebTarget instances, a new WebTarget needs a new injection framework instance. That's where the time is spent.
> > HTH,
> > Jan
> >
> > Confidential- Oracle Internal
> > ________________________________
> > From: jersey-dev <jersey-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Martynas Jusevičius via jersey-dev <jersey-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2025 8:35 PM
> > To: jersey developer discussions <jersey-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [External] : [jersey-dev] How To Use Jersey Client Efficiently
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > There was this article from 2015 by Jakub Podlesak called How To Use
> > Jersey Client Efficiently.
> > It's gone from the Oracle site but can be found on the Wayback Machine:
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://web.archive.org/web/20210420010938/https:/*blogs.oracle.com/japod/how-to-use-jersey-client-efficiently__;Lw!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!IL5I1_uKkYpaJ5ory5lAu-oSbdP02kJBwE6QTWJ7afqzdKSXIZkdvhTT-Um2fTZ0am93fi3_axsS7EovaW3Ptg$
> >
> > It says this about the 2.x Client API:
> > "Be careful when touching configuration of a web target!. What does it
> > mean? Whenever you create a new web target with updated configuration,
> > Jersey will effectively create a new client runtime. To keep your
> > application performing well, you should think of reusing all such web
> > targets."
> >
> > Is this still the case using Jersey 3.x? Or is it fine to register
> > features directly on WebTargets?
> >
> > Currently I am reusing the same Client instance to access multiple
> > different APIs.
> > However those APIs may require different features, e.g.
> > HttpAuthenticationFeature.
> > What is the standard solution here - use a Client per API or just
> > register the features on WebTarget? Maybe behind the scenes it's
> > effectively the same?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Martynas
> > atomgraph.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > jersey-dev mailing list
> > jersey-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jersey-dev__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!IL5I1_uKkYpaJ5ory5lAu-oSbdP02kJBwE6QTWJ7afqzdKSXIZkdvhTT-Um2fTZ0am93fi3_axsS7Eqvo1uGYA$


Back to the top