Thanks, this helps a lot! :-) JPMS: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jaxrs-api/issues/640 Regarding RX, would you think that it would be even too early to discuss support Java SE 9's Flow API for JAX-RS 3.0? -Markus From: jaxrs-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jaxrs-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andy McCright
Sent: Dienstag, 24. Juli 2018 18:32
To: jaxrs developer discussions
Subject: Re: [jaxrs-dev] [Discuss] Initial Roadmap / Preliminary Release Schedule I'll chime in! :) For JPMS, I think we should probably start some discussions around this, but there is still a lot of assumptions that are unsettled (like whether we can legally use a module name that starts with "javax"). Some of the issues to resolve is whether we want a single large module that encompasses the entire JAX-RS APIs or whether we want to be more fine-grained and allow users to pick and choose - i.e. just the client APIs, or everything-but-SSE, etc. For NIO/Reactive, I think there is a lot of buzz around this, but I think the technology is still a bit premature. I'm still wrapping my head around the ideas of reactive, and others like the MicroProfile group are trying to incubate reactive concepts in a cloud-native environment. I suspect that as that group continues to make progress, open source implementations will start to form around it and then we can standardize on those implementations. I want to be cautious and not introduce unproven technology into a spec - and I think that was the argument Markus was making as well. Major vendors do follow this mailing list. Let's see who chimes in… -Markus From: Reza Rahman [mailto:reza_rahman@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Dienstag, 24. Juli 2018 17:32
To: Markus KARG; 'jaxrs developer discussions'
Subject: Re: [jaxrs-dev] [Discuss] Initial Roadmap / Preliminary Release Schedule The thing is that I didn't even see this in the "ice box"? Vendors really don't think these are priorities to remain competitive? If that's the case, let's rectify that by discussing why these matter?
On 7/24/2018 7:18 AM, Markus KARG wrote: Yes, I miss these issues too, but is there a product already supporting that, and are the other vendors willing to implement that in the outlined time frame? If yes, I will add this. If no, adding it to the milestone makes no sense (it would just stop us from releasing). -Markus From: Reza Rahman [mailto:reza_rahman@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Dienstag, 24. Juli 2018 00:19
To: jaxrs developer discussions; Markus KARG
Subject: Re: [jaxrs-dev] [Discuss] Initial Roadmap / Preliminary Release Schedule I may be missing something, but these are the big ticket items I would like to see:
* NIO capabilities/greater alignment with reactive/Reactive Streams
* Support for JPMS
On 7/21/2018 7:49 AM, Markus KARG wrote: Committers, I have hacked down a very short initial roadmap https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jaxrs-api/wiki/Roadmap and would love to discuss it with you. :-) -Markus
_______________________________________________ jaxrs-dev mailing list jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jaxrs-dev
_______________________________________________
jaxrs-dev mailing list
jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jaxrs-dev
|
