The thing is that I didn't even see this in the "ice box"? Vendors really don't think these are priorities to remain competitive? If that's the case, let's rectify that by discussing why these matter?
On 7/24/2018 7:18 AM, Markus KARG wrote:
Yes, I miss these issues too, but is there a product already supporting that, and are the other vendors willing to implement that in the outlined time frame? If yes, I will add this. If no, adding it to the milestone makes no sense (it would just stop us from releasing).
-Markus
From: Reza Rahman [mailto:reza_rahman@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Dienstag, 24. Juli 2018 00:19
To: jaxrs developer discussions; Markus KARG
Subject: Re: [jaxrs-dev] [Discuss] Initial Roadmap / Preliminary Release Schedule
I may be missing something, but these are the big ticket items I would like to see:
* NIO capabilities/greater alignment with reactive/Reactive Streams
* Support for JPMS
On 7/21/2018 7:49 AM, Markus KARG wrote:
Committers,
I have hacked down a very short initial roadmap https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jaxrs-api/wiki/Roadmap and would love to discuss it with you. :-)
-Markus
_______________________________________________
jaxrs-dev mailing list
jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jaxrs-dev
