It's in the platform
TCK Users Guide, search for rule "EE-WP21".
Yes, that document hasn't been updated for Jakarta EE yet, but we
don't expect the rules to change.
(These AsciiDoc files don't display correctly on github.com because
of the JBake header.)
(The "EE-WP" prefix suggests this is specific to the Web Profile.
That's a bug. There's a separate set of Web Profile rules. These
rules should just have an "EE" prefix.")
Scott Highbarger wrote on 6/25/19 12:43
PM:
I think that largely matches what I was thinking
as well. But I have not seen that clearly documented outside
of the some of the legacy EE8 guides. I just noticed today
there has been some recent updates to the Jakarta guides so
perhaps this is covered there.
Scott E. Highbarger
[shighbar@xxxxxxxxxx]
Advisory Software Engineer
WebSphere Application Server CTS
IBM Software Group
(303) 773-5264
 Bill Shannon ---06/25/2019 01:37:01
PM---It depends entirely on what "product" you're trying to
certify. If you have a Jakarta EE platform pr
From: Bill
Shannon <bill.shannon@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: jakartaee-tck
developer discussions <jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Scott Highbarger <shighbar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 06/25/2019
01:37 PM
Subject: [EXTERNAL]
Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] Discussion on stand alone TCKs as part
of the certification process
It depends entirely on what "product" you're trying to certify.
If you have a Jakarta EE platform product, you'll need to certify
with the Jakarta EE platform TCK. Since several required TCKs are
not integrated with the platform TCK, the platform TCK rules
require you to separately test with some of these other TCKs (such
as CDI and BV).
If you have a product that supports only the WebSocket API, you
need to test with the WebSocket TCK.
If you have a product that supports the Jakarta EE platform and
also allows you to use pieces of that product independently of the
entire platform, you'll need to certify with the platform TCK and
the TCKs for all pieces that are usable independently.
Does that make sense?
Scott Highbarger wrote on 6/25/19 11:51 AM:
Some of the recent discussions on stand alone
TCKs got me to wondering what if any are we going to require
as part of the Jakarta certification process? Is the
jakartaeetck the only hard requirement and the stand alone
TCKs additional for extra features/implementations? Many of
the stand alone TCKs clearly have over lap with the
jakartaeetck but specifically I've been thinking of this in
the context of areas like the CDI 2.0 TCK and websocket 1.1
etc. which do not have as much over lap.
The CDI 2.0 was technically part of the EE8 Spec, while I
believe the websocket 1.1 level was not. I'm wondering what
the rest of the community is thinking in regards to these
stand alone TCKs that don't directly over lap the
jakartaeetck?
Scott E. Highbarger
[shighbar@xxxxxxxxxx]
Advisory Software Engineer
WebSphere Application Server CTS
IBM Software Group
(303) 773-5264
_______________________________________________
jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list
jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password,
or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev
|
