On 2022-08-13 Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
RMB> So since target is to base everything useful - never said EJB was
RMB> ;) - on CDI so making it SeContainer friendly at some point I
RMB> guess there is a need for a new CDI Web Profile (hopefully light
RMB> enough to be generic, i.e. without jpa nor jaxrs) and maybe a
RMB> jaxrs+joa flavor (CDI Full Web Profile), and a messaging profile
RMB> etc...
RMB> At some point profiles are a pain for consumers cause you just
RMB> can’t rely on them (they move and grow more than needed).
RMB> So guess goal should be:
RMB> 1. Ensure everything done is cdi friendly (SeContainer flavor
RMB> included) and works by dropping the impl (thanks cdi extensions
RMB> mechanism)
RMB> 2. Ensure 1 implies profiles are just a default vendor packaging
RMB> but are actually useless technically for users since they can do
RMB> their own container thanks 1.
Pardon my ignorance. I am entering into this discussion one whole
calendar quarter late. I would like to know the resolution of Arjan's
original question. Was any decision taken on this matter?
Thanks,
Ed
| edburns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | office: +1 954 727 1095
| Calendar Booking:
https://aka.ms/meetedburns
|
| Please don't feel obliged to read or reply to this e-mail outside
| of your normal working hours.