+1 for letting the RI committers decide -Markus Von: jakartaee-platform-dev [mailto:jakartaee-platform-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von David Blevins Gesendet: Sonntag, 3. April 2022 05:44 An: cu developer discussions Cc: jakartaee-platform developer discussions Betreff: Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] [cu-dev] Come up with new name for the Concurrency implementation project It's great to see implementations be mindful of creating names distinct from the Specifications themselves. Big applause. I only question if we want spec project lists being used by implementations like this. Is there already an Eclipse project for the "Concurrency RI" that is separate from the Jakarta Currency project and committers? If there is a separate project, this conversation should likely be moved to that list. If not, we should create that project and let those committers decide.
The implementation project for Jakarta Concurrency is now called "Concurrency RI". We previously decided to not have former RI projects call themselves an RI or anything hinting at that. I've created this issue for that, but nothing much happened yet: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/concurrency-ri/issues/49 I did a name proposal there now: "SynchronicityX" _______________________________________________ cu-dev mailing list cu-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cu-dev |