[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] Standardizing new TCK packages (was: package prefixes for Jakarta Batch TCK-related classes? org.eclipse.ee4j.batch ?)
|
Sounds like a good improvement to me as well
> On Jan 4, 2022, at 12:23 PM, Emily Jiang via jakartaee-platform-dev <jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I had this matter discussed in today's platform call. Below is the suggestion for the naming convention:
> • [Emily] Package naming convention for TCKs?
> • Packages for TCK starts with various names, e.g. org.ibm, org.jboss, org.eclipse, jakarta.[spec].tck etc,
> • Should they be standardized?
>
> • Two things need naming standard:
> • Packages
> • Suggested Naming Standard: jakarta.tck.[spec]
> • New classes in existing TCKs should use the new name standard
> • Artifacts
> • Same group id as the spec
> • Artifact ids [foo]-tck
> • Existing TCKs may change if they like
> New TCKs must use the new name standard
>
> The above is the general consensus from the meeting. I will start a new thread conversation for others to comment on the naming convention.
Others can chime in, but I like the above recommendation. Using jakarta.tck.[spec] is just as good as org.eclipse.jakarta.tck.[spec], perhaps better.
Also agree that it should be standard across the various TCKs.
-David
_______________________________________________
jakartaee-platform-dev mailing list
jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-platform-dev
