Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [External] : [BALLOT] Release Review for Jakarta P

[Emily Jiang <emijiang6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Now I understand the explanation. Where is this documented? If not documented, can we have this documented somewhere?

Thanks

Emily

On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 7:39 PM Ed Bratt <ed.bratt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Please see my response to the similar inquiry under the RESTful web services [1]. I hope that resolves your question. If the ballot passes, the link will point to the final TCK -- until then, you need to refer to the link in the initial check-list in the PR conversation.

-- Ed

[1] https://www.eclipse.org/lists/jakarta.ee-spec/msg02379.html

On 4/5/2022 9:57 AM, Emily Jiang via jakarta.ee-spec wrote:

I checked the artifacts. However, the link to the TCKs is broken from here. I would like this fixed before IBM can vote.

Thanks

Emily

On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 4:31 PM Ed Bratt <ed.bratt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

+1 (Oracle)

-- Ed Bratt

On 3/23/2022 11:11 AM, Ivar Grimstad wrote:

Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee,

I request your vote to approve and ratify the release of Jakarta Persistence 3.1 as part of the Jakarta EE Platform 10 release.

The JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the products of this release as a Final Specification (as that term is defined in the EFSP).

The relevant materials are available here:
- https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/442 

- https://deploy-preview-442--jakartaee-specifications.netlify.app/specifications/persistence/3.1/

Per the process, this will be a fourteen-day ballot, ending on Wednesday, April 6, 2022, that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Tomitribe, Primeton, and Shandong Cvicse Middleware Co.), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.

Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.

Thanks,

Ivar

--

Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration. 

--

Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration. 

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!aEjq_DMXvGouLp8usnLijCZNmJRQBrXJziYAezAiNME5N166MuzNFSSmvxZiWQ0$ 

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec

--

Thanks
Emily

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!avyMskqMVd4c0SJ7DFrH6wWU6VG7XbEdR5yQa6VUE8ZQxY7nNo_CmCfoOAhTLbA$ 

--

Thanks
Emily