[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [External] : Re: [BALLOT] Jakarta RESTful Web Services 3.1
|
Emily
This is a (mis) feature of our process -- The agreed process is
to include TCK links in the PR conversation [1]. Once the ballot
concludes, the final TCKs are copied (as is) to the location of
these links. CDI included links to the proposed final TCK. Once
the TCK is copied into the Spec. download, the links will
presumably be updated so they point into the Specification
normative download folder (currently, this link in the CDI 4
Preview, does not point to the proper final location). The TCK
file SHA sum is used to verify that the exact TCK used for the
ballot and the CCR, are one and the same.
[1] CDI
Spec. PR -- look in the initial submitter checklist, about
two thirds the way down.
On 4/5/2022 10:03 AM, Emily Jiang via
jakarta.ee-spec wrote:
I found the link to tck jars are broken from
here. Any reasons? CDI 4.0 has
the workable links to tck jars etc.
Thanks
Emily
+1 (Fujitsu)
-Kenji Kazumura
Greetings
Jakarta EE Specification Committee,
I request your vote to approve and ratify the
release of Jakarta RESTful Web Services 3.1 as
part of the Jakarta EE Platform 10 release.
The
JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the
Specification Committee in order to ratify the
products of this release as a Final
Specification (as that term is defined in the
EFSP).
The relevant materials are available here:
- https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/430
- https://deploy-preview-430--jakartaee-specifications.netlify.app/specifications/restful-ws/3.1/
Per the process, this will be a fourteen-day
ballot, ending on Wednesday, April 6, 2022,
that requires a Super-majority positive vote of
the Specification Committee members (note that
there is no veto). Community input is welcome,
but only votes cast by Specification Committee
Representatives will be counted.
The Specification Committee is composed of
representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group
Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara,
Tomitribe, Primeton, and Shandong Cvicse
Middleware Co.), along with individuals who
represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and
Committer Members.
Specification Committee representatives, your
vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1
(positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any
feedback that you can provide to support your
vote will be appreciated.
Please note that since this is a restart of
the ballot for this specification, all members
are requested to vote, even if you voted in
the ballot that was discontinued.
Thanks,
--
Ivar Grimstad
Jakarta EE Developer
Advocate |
Eclipse Foundation
Eclipse
Foundation - Community. Code.
Collaboration.
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec
--
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!eZ74wASSelaPli8mGu--ZW9V2fogQZBz8OeNDIiUQUH8v2neaF5v9LRFpntdrZI$