Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [] [BALLOT] Approve the Jakarta TCK package naming convention ee.jakarta.tck.[spec]

-1, PMC
The general agreement in the last plattform project call was that the spec projects are free to choose a package structure of their choice for their TCK as long as it doesn't start with 'jakarta'. At least for EE10. Some sort of consistency, or naming rule, may be decided later.

On Wed, Jan 19, 2022, 18:38 Andrew Pielage <andrew.pielage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
0 (Payara)

The vote has essentially elapsed and I'm struggling to understand this because there isn't a fully detailed proposal - just links to email chains.

If I'm understanding the conversation correctly - this isn't being proposed as a mandatory requirement for Jakarta EE 10 (just a recommendation to avoid any jakarta.* packages for the TCK), but it will be for 11 (and presumably also for any 10.x releases?). Again, it's hard to parse because this proposal is just comprised of email chains and a discussion in the spec committee call (and apparently also on the platform call which I don't personally join).


Andrew Pielage

Java Developer at Payara Services Ltd

Payara - Supported Enterprise Software for Jakarta EE and MicroProfile Applications

From: <> on behalf of Emily Jiang via <>
Sent: 12 January 2022 22:22
To: Jakarta specification discussions <>
Cc: Emily Jiang <emijiang6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [] [BALLOT] Approve the Jakarta TCK package naming convention ee.jakarta.tck.[spec]

Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee.

After a long discussion on the naming convention of the Jakarta TCK namespaces, the Jakarta community chose the package name: ee.jakarta.tck.[spec]. 

I need your vote to approve the Jakarta TCK package name ee.jakarta.tck.[spec]

Per the process, this will be a seven-day ballot, ending on January 19, 2022, that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Tomitribe, Primeton, and Shandong Cvicse Middleware Co.), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.

Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.



_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit

Back to the top