[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
| 
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [External] : [BALLOT] Approve the Jakarta TCK package naming convention ee.jakarta.tck.[spec]
 | 
  
    -1 (Oracle)
    We think this needs to be proposed and more clearly described and
      the conformance timelines must be made explicit. The current
      proposal suggests this must be implemented immediately if adopted.
    We currently allow TCK tests to be defined as the Specification
      group desires. I cannot speak for other organizations but many of
      the Oracle team members were unaware there was even a Google poll
      so they did not have a chance to weigh in, had they wished. I do
      not think that the Spec. committee had reached a consensus prior
      to the initiation of this ballot. If there are immediate actions
      that must take place for the completion of Jakarta EE 10, I would
      propose those be handled directly with the Specification committer
      teams. A consensus recommendation is certainly welcome but we
      don't understand the need to force-rush this, at this time.
    
    -- Ed Bratt
    
    On 1/12/2022 2:22 PM, Emily Jiang via
      jakarta.ee-spec wrote:
    
    
      
      
        Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee.
          
          After a long discussion on the naming
          convention of the Jakarta TCK namespaces, the Jakarta
          community chose the package name: ee.jakarta.tck.[spec]. 
        
          I need your vote to approve the Jakarta TCK package name ee.jakarta.tck.[spec]
        Per the process, this will be a seven-day ballot,
          ending on January 19, 2022, that requires a
          Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee
          members (note that there is no veto). Community input is
          welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee
          Representatives will be counted.
          
          The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of
          the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM,
          Oracle, Payara, Tomitribe, Primeton, and Shandong Cvicse
          Middleware Co.), along with individuals who represent the EE4J
          PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.
          
          Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby
          requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or
          -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your
          vote will be appreciated.
          
          Thanks
        
        
        -- 
        
       
      
      
      _______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!YgehUDLv5YJklphUQRxE8SpVeDChJ-d9_8-IsSqiH8LHK4rypryqMEJX-Kpkqvw$