Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [] [External] : [BALLOT] Approve the Jakarta TCK package naming convention ee.jakarta.tck.[spec]

-1 (Oracle)

We think this needs to be proposed and more clearly described and the conformance timelines must be made explicit. The current proposal suggests this must be implemented immediately if adopted.

We currently allow TCK tests to be defined as the Specification group desires. I cannot speak for other organizations but many of the Oracle team members were unaware there was even a Google poll so they did not have a chance to weigh in, had they wished. I do not think that the Spec. committee had reached a consensus prior to the initiation of this ballot. If there are immediate actions that must take place for the completion of Jakarta EE 10, I would propose those be handled directly with the Specification committer teams. A consensus recommendation is certainly welcome but we don't understand the need to force-rush this, at this time.

-- Ed Bratt

On 1/12/2022 2:22 PM, Emily Jiang via wrote:

Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee.

After a long discussion on the naming convention of the Jakarta TCK namespaces, the Jakarta community chose the package name: ee.jakarta.tck.[spec]. 

I need your vote to approve the Jakarta TCK package name ee.jakarta.tck.[spec]

Per the process, this will be a seven-day ballot, ending on January 19, 2022, that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Tomitribe, Primeton, and Shandong Cvicse Middleware Co.), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.

Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.



_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!YgehUDLv5YJklphUQRxE8SpVeDChJ-d9_8-IsSqiH8LHK4rypryqMEJX-Kpkqvw$ 

Back to the top