Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [] BALLOT: Creation Review for Jakarta Config



The ballot has been approved:


Kenji Kazumura (Fujitsu)                               +1

David Blevins (Tomitribe)                             +1

Ed Bratt (Oracle)                                              +1

Andrew Pielage (Payara)                               +1

Martijn Verburg (Participant Member)   +1

Kevin Sutter (IBM)                                           +1

Scott Stark (Red Hat)                                      -1

Ivar Grimstad (PMC)                                       +1

Werner Keil (Committer Member)           +1

Jun Qian (Primeton)                                       +1





From: <> On Behalf Of Dmitry Kornilov
Sent: 13 October 2021 21:54
To: Jakarta specification discussions <>
Subject: [External] : Re: [] BALLOT: Creation Review for Jakarta Config




Reminding you that there is about 24 hours left before the Jakarta Config ends. There is still no vote from Tomitribe.





From: <> On Behalf Of Dmitry Kornilov
Sent: 07 October 2021 11:04
Subject: [External] : [] BALLOT: Creation Review for Jakarta Config


Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee,


I need your vote to approve the Creation Review of Jakarta Config. It’s the second ballot. The first ballot was improperly held because of the patent license issues. The project got an exception from the Steering Committee to use Compatible Patent License (CPL).


The relevant materials are here:


Per the process, this will be a seven-day ballot, ending on the October 14th, that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.


The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Red Hat, Tomitribe, and Primeton), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.


Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.




Back to the top