Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [] BALLOT: Creation Review for Jakarta Config

+1 (Tomitribe)

We still do not agree with the concept of CPL or that patent lawsuits can bring anything positive to our ecosystem, however we respect the outcome of the related votes that have take place on this matter.

David Blevins

On Oct 7, 2021, at 2:03 AM, Dmitry Kornilov <dmitry.kornilov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee,
I need your vote to approve the Creation Review of Jakarta Config. It’s the second ballot. The first ballot was improperly held because of the patent license issues. The project got an exception from the Steering Committee to use Compatible Patent License (CPL).
Per the process, this will be a seven-day ballot, ending on the October 14th, that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.
The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Red Hat, Tomitribe, and Primeton), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.
Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.
_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit

Back to the top