Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [] Interceptors seems like a template spec

On 8/25/21 10:43 AM, Scott Stark wrote:
We were discussing @Interceptors in the CDI call and realized this project does not produce a TCK. It is another spec that is relies on the platform TCK:

We also have many tests for this in the CDI TCK. This is a bad arrangement because it is one of the base api dependencies for CDI, and EJB. It would make more sense to have this in CDI and drop the platform tests and create a new standalone TCK from the existing CDI tests. is a list of the Platform TCK tests that reference jakarta.interceptor classes.  Within the EJB tests that use jakarta.interceptor, there is a subset that seem to be specifically for testing @Interceptors which seem to be contained in a `/interceptor/` test folder. 

Opinions on this?

I'm not personally against moving certain EJB/Interceptors tests to the CDI TCK but will ask for more input on Platform TCK ml + EJB SPEC ML.


_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit

Back to the top