Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Review for Approval: Jakarta EE Specification Committee Meeting Minutes - June 11th

The minutes for the June 11th Specification Committee call are below and are also available here. Please review and be ready for approval during our call on June 25th.

Jakarta EE Spec Committee - June 11th, 2025
Attendees (present in bold):

Kenji Kazumura - Fujitsu
Emily Jiang - IBM - Tom Watson
Ed Bratt - Oracle - Dmitry Kornilov
Andrew Pielage (chair)  - Payara - Petr Aubrecht
David Blevins - Tomitribe - Jean-Louis Monteiro, Cesar Hernandez
Ivar Grimstad - PMC Representative
Marcelo Ancelmo - Participant Member -  Abraham Marin-Perez
Werner Keil - Committer Member
Jun Qian - Primeton Information Technologies - Enterprise Member
Zhai Luchao -  Shandong Cvicse Middleware Co. - Enterprise Member

Guest - Jakarta EE 11 co-release coordinators: Ed Burns, Jared Anderson
 
Eclipse Foundation: Tanja Obradovic

Past business / action items:
  • Approval is requested for the minutes from the May 28th, 2025 meeting as drafted - Approved
Agenda:
  • Catch up on the Jakarta EE 11 Release Plan [Ed Burns]
  • Catch up on the Jakarta EE 12 Release Plan [Jared Anderson]
  • Ongoing tracking spreadsheet of specifications progressing through the JESP specification version lifecycle
  • Jakarta EE Namespace - Discuss whether the language we have around Jakarta package namespace requirements needs tightening up. Email.
    • Who decides the namespace of a spec?
      • Spec Committee can apply rules e.g. “must be jakarta.*”
    • Is org.eclipse.microprofile allowed in Jakarta EE?
      • Under the current JESP - arguable, depends how you read it
    • Was the intention in the JESP text that it was meant to be a global rule? “everything must use jakarta.*”
      • This is ambiguous, differing opinions from those who were present when this was decided
    • Should we update the language in the JESP to make this clear?
      • Consensus is yes we should clarify it, as it helps inform MicroProfile what their options are
    • Proposed Resolution: Add to the JESP: “All specifications must use the jakarta.* namespace”
      • Ivar Grimstad first
      • Andrew Pielage seconded
      • Will be put to the mailing list as a ballot
        • Andrew Pielage to start it
  • Issue #55 - TCK Archive Format [Ed Bratt]
    • Ran out of time, not discussed…
    • Check in on Ed Bratt’s PR: pending
  • Issue #83 - Clean up and clarify how to list TCK service releases on spec pages [Andrew Pielage]
    • Ran out of time, not discussed…
    • Check on progress of pull requests
  • Issue #74 - TCK challenge automatic acceptance - [Ed Bratt]
    • Ran out of time, not discussed…
    • Check on progress of specifications
  • Issue #58 - TCK challenge templates [Andrew Pielage]
    • Ran out of time, not discussed…
    • Check on progress of pull requests
  • Issue #82 - Consistent approach for TCK challenge exclusions [Ed Bratt]
    • Ran out of time, not discussed…
    • Carry over from February 19th: TCK Process should be updated with something akin to Scott Starks suggestion.
  • Review other open issues:
    • Ran out of time, not discussed…
    • Determine which issues to label as “enhancement” and add to our board
    • Close issues which are no longer relevant or have been dealt with


--
Andrew Pielage
Senior Software Engineer
Twitter LinkedIn Instagram
 
Website
 
Phone
+448005385490
Try our fully managed cloud native application runtime. 15 day trial available. Payara.cloud
Payara Services Ltd, Registered office: Malvern Hills Science Park, Geraldine Road, Malvern, WR14 3SZ, United Kingdom
Registered in England and Wales: 09998946 | VAT: GB 193854467
Payara is a proud recipient of the prestigious Queen's Award for Enterprise: International Trade 2021


Back to the top