|
Hi Paul,
I thought last week we agreed to call a special meeting today to check on the EE 10 status. However, I did not see any invitation sent. Do we still need to meet up today?
Thanks
Emily
================
Emily Jiang
Java Champion
STSM, Jakarta and MicroProfile Architect
@IBM
Liberty
Cloud Native Architect & Advocate
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/emilyfhjiang/
IBM United Kingdom Limited
Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU
From: jakarta.ee-spec.committee <jakarta.ee-spec.committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Paul Buck <paul.buck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 20 April 2022 12:51
To: Jakarta specification committee <jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Agenda for the April 20th Jakarta EE Specification Committee call
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
All good, our priority for the call however is the progressing all the Jakarta EE 10 component specs to ballot.
... Paul
I also lifted the item that Tom added last time but no time to be discussed regarding TCKs not executable in EE container. After last call, I initiated an offline conversation ( https://www.eclipse.org/lists/jakartaee-platform-dev/msg03360.html)
and a few of us commented and it was discussed on platform call last week, but no consensus was reached. I think we need to discuss this further and provide some guidance.
|
As you may know, we have been discussing the issue of the standalone JSON-B, JSON-P executed in the SE container only. Last week, the issue was brought up and discussed among the Jakarta Specification committee.
|
Thanks
Emily
================
Emily Jiang
Java Champion
STSM, Jakarta and MicroProfile Architect
@IBM
Liberty
Cloud Native Architect & Advocate
IBM United Kingdom Limited
Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU
One item to discuss is whether there needs to be more emphasis on producing public milestone releases of spec
project API jars (released to maven central) in the process guide. Some project do not want or cannot incorporate a staging repository
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
One item to discuss is whether there needs to be more emphasis on producing public milestone releases of spec project API jars (released to maven central) in the process guide. Some project do not want or cannot incorporate a staging repository
into their build process and the lack of maven central artifacts has slowed down updating implementations and testing of the TCKs.
The agenda for our committee call on Wednesday at 16:00 UTC is here.
Please add any other business items as required.
Please be prepared to discuss the readiness for ballot of the specs you mentor. Component specs need to be in ballot no later than May 1st.
Password: SpecCmte
Thanks ... Paul
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee
|
