Tanja/all,
Thanks for the Input and suggestion. Guess we don’t know if 12 noon was a problem for our British participants or others like Emily who I believe joined the call once or twice on behalf of IBM, but especially LJC was not that active in the call anyway, so it may not get worse by that O;-)
For me 1pm or 2pm sounds doable, although earlier in the day (than 5 or 6pm) there is always a risk of competing conf calls with my client I may not be able to postpone. As long as I am not supposed to be on site in their office after the COVID situation improved drastically around lunchtime every other week sounds fine for me as well. After that it could be a challenge because I cannot use conf call Systems other than their own if I am on-site and it is a little too far to go into town just for a lunchbreak, but for the time being it would be OK for me.
Happy Holidays,
Werner
Thanks Kenji!
We will discuss on the first call in the 2021, but I expect that both times would be acceptable (11pm JST, 9am EST should be very easy), provided it works for all.
Scott, any input from you?
Happy holidays to all!
Thanks,
Tanja
> tempted to suggest 8 PM China, 9 PM in Japan. This would be 7 AM EST, 1 PM CET -- until
This slot is very fine for me.
And, two hours late time (11pm JST, 9am EST) is still fine for me.
-Kenji Kazumrua
Tanja, and co,
I am in favor of having alternative meeting times that accommodate members in different time-zones. I wonder if once a month is enough for folks in the far east.
Looking at the respective time-zones, I wonder if we could even do better if we held the "alternate" meeting fixed on China/Japan time-zones -- Looking at the time-and-date meeting planner I'd be tempted to suggest 8 PM China, 9 PM in Japan. This would be 7 AM EST, 1 PM CET -- until summer when US and Europe would move to an hour later.
Both these adjusted times would probably preclude Mountain or West Coast time zones in the US but someone's in the dark, no matter when this is scheduled. (Plus, Dmitry would continue to provide quorum support for Oracle.)
Would this displace other member organizations?
Just a thought.
-- Ed
On 12/18/2020 8:51 AM, Tanja Obradovic wrote:
Hello members of the Specification Committee,
as we are having couple of members on the committee who are struggling with the meeting time, Kenji for years and Scott for a while now, I would like to have the group consider alternating or even changing the meeting times.
To start with we could alternate times like this
1. keep the first meeting of the month at the current time and have the second meeting at 7am PD / 10 am ED / 11PM CT / midnight 12 am JT
Kenji, Scott,
please comment if this would even work for you or you'd have other suggestions and then I would welcome others to make suggestions as well.
Best Regards,
Tanja
--
Tanja Obradovic
Jakarta EE Program Manager | Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
Twitter: @TanjaEclipse
Eclipse Foundation: The Platform for Open Innovation and Collaboration
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!LLdO2A_XuGkog80FiJwSdOsY_gOXOn7FooI4JuAFEtamtgyRrF0DjLC0yWQJYfQ$
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee
--
Tanja Obradovic
Jakarta EE Program Manager | Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
Twitter: @TanjaEclipse
Eclipse Foundation: The Platform for Open Innovation and Collaboration
