Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] TCK results

["Kevin Sutter" <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Bill,
Here's my take...
 If you feel more comfortable with duplicating the data, then do it.
 That's the way the instructions read today.  But, if you wish
to provide a link to the results page to avoid the duplicate work, then
that's fine as well.  Let's just roll with the punches this first
time around and we can adjust as needed.

---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter 
STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE architect
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx     Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter



From:
       Bill
Shannon <bill.shannon@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:
       Jakarta
specification committee <jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
       07/31/2019
12:59 PM
Subject:
       [EXTERNAL]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] TCK results
Sent
by:        jakarta.ee-spec.committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

In today's meeting it was suggested
that the certification request could
just be a link to the TCK summary results page, which would contain all
the information.

I'm concerned that this leaves us with no permanent record of what was
certified; we would be relying on the project to maintain that permanent
record.  Is everyone really ok with this?

I think I'd rather duplicate the information than have it only be maintained
by the project.  But it also seemed fine to me for the project to
point back
to this permanent record of what was certified.


Bill Shannon wrote on 7/29/19 3:12 PM:
> Following our process and getting all these different documents to
be
> consistent is a real pain.  Every time I think I'm done I discover
> something else that I missed.
> 
> Our TCK Process says:
> 
>> Public TCK Results Summary
>>
>> While certification is on your honor, the community MUST be able
to see your test results summary. At a minimum a results summary MUST:
>>
>>     Be publicly visible with no password protection
or sign-up
>>
>>     Include a Summary Page containing:
>>
>>         All information in the above Certification
Request
>>
>>         The Total number of tests run and
passed. If you are running a platform TCK, this means reporting the tests
run for each required TCK, which includes the platform TCK and some of
the individual TCKs that are not integrated with the platform TCK.
>>
> 
> So the Certification Request needs to include a URL to the TCK results.
> And the TCK results needs to include all the information in the
> Certification Request, including a link to itself.
> 
> Couldn't the TCK results just link back to the Certification Request?
> Wouldn't that be better than duplicating the information?
> _______________________________________________
> jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
> jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee
> 
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee