It may be inevitable that the community will acronym-ize these
names, but we were trying to choose names where that would be less
likely. And personally I believe we should avoid "J" acronyms so as
not to cause confusion with the existing JCP spec acronyms.
Is "xml-binding" not a good enough short name?
Wayne Beaton wrote on 5/24/19 7:07 AM:
Short names can only use alphanumerics and dashes
(no dots). Short names need to be unique across our project
space. We use these short names in web URLs, download
directories, ..., so concise is better.
How about "jxb"?
For now the full id of the project will be "ee4j.jxb".
There's a little more about this in the handbook.
Wayne
--
Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee
|