[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] JESP
|
Wayne Beaton wrote on 3/20/19 12:41 PM:
> I decided to remove the Steering Committee from notification requirement (in
> what is now bullet #4) since the Steering Committee is not listed as being on
> the hook for approval anywhere else in this document or in the EFSP. If
> anybody feels strongly about this, we might consider making the ballot be
> similar to that as for designating a profile (i.e. Super-majority of the
> strategic members of the working group).
What's the purpose of the Specification Committee taking 30 days to review the
updated JESP that the Specification Committee itself created?
The other review periods are to allow time for the Specification Committee to
review something that it has never seen before, and those periods are even shorter.
I assumed the JESP review was primarily to allow the Steering Committee to
oversee what the Specification Committee has proposed.
> I added a statement on a request from the Oracle lawyers that all
> modifications to the javax namespace must be done following the JESP.
And yet the Oracle legal required 30 day review period for IP lock in is being
rejected?
