Hi Bill, All,
please see my responses inline.
Hope this helps.
Tanja
On 2019-01-29 5:29 p.m., Bill Shannon
wrote:
I find it very weird that the agenda and all past minutes are just
one long document. Am I the only one?
At least shouldn't the approved minutes be split off and published
separately, and somehow made available to the public?
I would argue you see all past minutes... The intention, and
ideal situation, is to only have past meeting minuets from one
previous meeting and the Agenda fro the upcoming call. Since you
see other, older meeting minutes from early January, that were
previously approved, that just means I did not get a
chance to publish them yet. Let me assure you it is on my
to-do-list. As soon as they get published they will be removed
from the document, and it will become a short document again.
And is there any point in having the minutes include items that
were not discussed in the meeting? I suppose I could see having a
list of agenda items for the meeting, some of which were not
covered, but the minutes have much more detail than that.
I prefer to keep all items that still need discussion with relevant
relevant details for the context and future discussions. I find
often, after a revisiting items that were parked for a while, we are
not sure what was discussed last. If repetition bothers you and
others, I am open not to publish what was not discussed in the
meeting minutes, but would still prefer to keep them on the long
version of the Agenda until the item is closed.
For tomorrow's meeting, is there a presentation on the TCK process
or the Jakarta EE spec process? Who's giving it? Is there a
proposal we should be reviewing? Or is this just an opportunity
for open discussion? (I'm trying to understand the path to
closing on these items.)
I do not have any presentations lined up for tomorrow, however we
will continue conversation on TCK, from Red Hat and discuss how to
proceed next, as indicated at the end of the last call. David
Blevins is taking the lead here and will be helping with this.
For Jakarta EE spec process, as before Wayne Beaton is leading
and he will provide an update on the progress and next steps. The
documents that can be reviewed are in the Agenda "long document",
and everyone should feel free to review them.
Thanks.
Tanja Obradovic wrote on 1/29/19 1:55
PM:
Hi All,
our call tomorrow is right after the Town Hall call for the
community. Here is what I have on the agenda for tomorrow. The
focus of the call should be TCK process and Jakarta EE process
-
Approval of Meeting min Jan 23rd
-
Jakarta EE Town Hall call for the community - short update
-
Java EE Specification Documents contribution from Oracle - short update
- Jakarta EE 8 release - short update
-
TCK process
-
Jakarta EE Spec process
Regards,
Tanja
--
Tanja Obradovic
Jakarta EE Program Manager | Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
Twitter: @TanjaEclipse
Eclipse Foundation: The Platform for Open Innovation and Collaboration
|
This email has been checked for
viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
|
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee
--
Tanja Obradovic
Jakarta EE Program Manager | Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
Twitter: @TanjaEclipse
Eclipse Foundation: The Platform for Open Innovation and Collaboration