[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
[jakarta.ee-spec.committee] types of review
|
The JCP allowed for two types of review - full JSR and MR.
I always wished that MR had been split into "minor release"
and "errata".
The current Eclipse specification process only describes a
single type of review. My (limited) understanding of the EDP
is that two types of release review are possible - one for
bug fixes and one for new functionality. Would that apply
to Specification Projects as well, and if so how? Are bug
fixes to a spec only errata? Does any functional change to
a spec require a full release review?
How would you compare the "weight" of a full release review
with the JCP MR process? Can a full release review be lightweight
enough to easily handle simple straightforward changes to a spec
(and implementation, and TCK)?
Can someone produce a timeline view of the spec release process,
similar to the picture at the top of the JCP Spec Lead Guide?
https://jcp.org/en/resources/guide
Thanks.
