[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Werner's comment
|
Mike Milinkovich wrote on 08/30/2018 08:15 AM:
> On 2018-08-30 11:12 AM, Richard Monson-Haefel wrote:
>> Having additional candidates for the process is great. Is this specific to
>> MicroProfile? If so, than I think it should remain in the MP project. They
>> have their own process for specifications. If its not MP specific and can
>> complement the Jakarta EE platform than I would support adding it as a candidate.
>
> Config is already in MicroProfile. If I am reading this correctly the
> suggestion would be to make it the first MP spec that moves to the Jakarta EE
> process. FWIW, there could be good reasons to do so because I expect that
> there will be Oracle-imposed restrictions on all specs that use the javax
> namespace, not just the ones where Oracle was the JCP Spec Lead.
Correct.
If they complete a release at the JCP, we could add them to the list of specs
for which we would license use of the Java trademark. While it might be
possible to add them to this list later, it will be much simpler if this is done
before the Trademark license is completed, if it is to be done at all.
Or, as suggested, they can withdraw their JSR and move to the Jakarta EE spec
process and use the Jakarta trademark instead.
