Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Werner's comment

[Richard Monson-Haefel <rmonson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Having additional candidates for the process is great. Is this specific to MicroProfile?  If so, than I think it should remain in the MP project. They have their own process for specifications. If its not MP specific and can complement the Jakarta EE platform than I would support adding it as a candidate.

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 4:31 PM, Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

All,

Werner added a comment to the draft minutes of our meeting today. I cannot keep it as part of the minutes since we did not discuss it on the call, but I thought it was pertinent so wanted to capture it for everyone via this email:

Create a plan to deliver a draft Specification Process for CodeOne/EclipseCon

Creating a draft from scratch may not work there, but in the EG discussion Emily sounded very interested to also migrate the non-final Config JSR to Jakarta EE, see: https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/configjsr-experts/msg00059.html If what was discussed for JNoSQL applies to a future version of the Config Spec, then it would end up with at least 2 package name spaces. Migrating it now before it even entered MavenCentral could avoid that.

--
Mike Milinkovich
mike.milinkovich@eclipse-foundation.org
(m) +1.613.220.3223

---

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee