Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [] JAKARTA EE microservices top level diagram ?

Hi Zahid,
My comments are inline.

On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 4:47 PM Zahid Rahman <zahidr1000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jakarta  EE  has this website
 which supposedly lists  all the  microservices technologies 

The website is about MicroProfile technologies not Jakarta EE. For Jakarta EE, you should visit
As for LRA, it was under Since MicroProfile LRA was not part of platform release, it was mentioned under the latest MicroProfile 4.1 release.

BUT the most important technology 
Microprofile LRA based on the Saga pattern  is not included. 

What you mentioned above is an old milestone release. The MicroProfile 1.0 final was released earlier this year. You can find the spec from here.

The only properly organised website on microservices is but he uses spring.


♡۶♡۶ ♡۶

On Tue, 7 Sep 2021, 15:44 Kevin Sutter, <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Zahid,
I don't see any references to JMS in your site.  But, based on what was there, the first question that comes to mind is why reference such an old architecture diagram (1999)?  For one thing, JMS was just getting started in 1999.  I think it was at version 1.0.  So, that could be a reason why it's not part of that particular diagram.  You might be better off starting with the diagrams from the Jakarta EE Platform Spec ( or finding other articles that discuss Jakarta EE and the overall architecture.  Just a suggestion...  Good luck!

Kevin Sutter
STSM, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile architect @ IBM
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx     Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    

Part-time schedule: Tue, Wed, Thu (off on Mon and Fri)

From:        "Zahid Rahman" <zahidr1000@xxxxxxxxx>
To:        "Jakarta EE community discussions" <>
Date:        09/04/2021 12:34
Subject:        [EXTERNAL] [] JMS fact check
Sent by:        "" <>


I have posed a couple of questions on my website suggesting reasons why JMS was left out  from the architectural diagram?

The questions are just below the diagram of J2EE level 0 in light blue text.

I like to be accurate in what I write.
I wonder if you can confirm my reason is probably correct or not ?
♡۶♡ ۶♡۶

_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit

_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit


Back to the top