| Re: [jakarta.ee-community] Fork Eclipse MicroProfile Configuration as Jakarta Configuration. |
The surprise is twofold from my perspective. The biggest one is the apparent suggestions that more buy-in needs to be done on the MicroProfile side. It seems whatever could have been tried there has already been done and now we need to focus mostly on what is right for Jakarta EE? The second is that there was apparently already some conversation that took part on the MicroProfile side as to what would happen on the Jakarta EE side once the pull vote was made that is apparently being now completely disregarded? When do we stop rehashing in seemingly unending circles and move forward on the decision making on the Jakarta side and take whatever decisions were made on the MicroProfile side as a fixed given? Reza Rahman Jakarta EE Ambassador, Author, Blogger, Speaker Please note views expressed here are my own as an individual community member and do not reflect the views of my employer. Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Scott Stark <sstark@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: 4/6/20 10:24 AM (GMT-05:00) To: Jakarta EE community discussions <jakarta.ee-community@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [jakarta.ee-community] Fork Eclipse MicroProfile Configuration
as Jakarta Configuration. clearly is a discussion going on here. When we had the MP pull vote it was clearly stated that how Jakarta consumed MP specs was to be defined on the Jakarta side. That is happening now. Why is it a surprise that there is not a unanimous opinion? On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 6:23 AM <werner.keil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This sounds totally hypocritic because you (Red Hat) did just that with JSR 330 when the contributors and Spec Leads were unwilling to contribute to Jakarta EE, so RH (Scott) forked it into Jakarta Inject Based on the mentioned ASLv2 allowing it. > > > > There is currently no evidence Google, Square or any of the other users of the Guice community are adopting Jakarta Inject, so it is just a fork whether anybody touches those old annotations or not. > > > > So why did you do it for Inject and say this should not be done with MP or the fork that already was done with JSR 382? > > > > Werner > _______________________________________________ jakarta.ee-community mailing list jakarta.ee-community@xxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-community |