Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-community] Fork Eclipse MicroProfile Configuration as Jakarta Configuration.

I don't think there has to be an unanimous decision in the Spec Committee, Steering Committee or any other relevant Jakarta EE body about that either, but these (and neither the subscribers to this list nor the MP one) have to make a decision when the time comes.

Some decisions like the namespace (because at least Steve and a few others also mentioned that here) or acceptable namespaces I'd say should be made ASAP on the Jakarta EE side. If there was a decision that only "jakarta.*" was acceptable within the API and specs then this would certainly be a strong argument for either migrating specs in question or (as a last resort) fork them.

Otherwise there should be enough time for the new MP WG if that's to be created soon to sort things out, apply the EFSP, 
try to address TCK problems and a few other issues that make it hard to accept it as it is into a future Jakarta EE release.

Werner 




On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 4:24 PM Scott Stark <sstark@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Because none of the JSR330 spec leads responded in any form. There
clearly is a discussion going on here. When we had the MP pull vote it
was clearly stated that how Jakarta consumed MP specs was to be
defined on the Jakarta side. That is happening now. Why is it a
surprise that there is not a unanimous opinion?

On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 6:23 AM <werner.keil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This sounds totally hypocritic because you (Red Hat) did just that with JSR 330 when the contributors and Spec Leads were unwilling to contribute to Jakarta EE, so RH (Scott) forked it into Jakarta Inject Based on the mentioned ASLv2 allowing it.
>
>
>
> There is currently no evidence Google, Square or any of the other users of the Guice community are adopting Jakarta Inject, so it is just a fork whether anybody touches those old annotations or not.
>
>
>
> So why did you do it for Inject and say this should not be done with MP or the fork that already was done with JSR 382?
>
>
>
> Werner
>

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-community mailing list
jakarta.ee-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-community

Back to the top