[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [jakarta.ee-community] Options for Jakarta EE and MP alignment
|
I would expect that both the MP and Jakarta specs included in a joint
base platform would continue to evolve at a more rapid pace, perhaps
being split to better support more rapid evolution where needed,
stability in more legacy aspects.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 10:37 AM arjan tijms <arjan.tijms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 6:30 PM Scott Stark <sstark@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> There is a conflict with the historic stability focus of
>> EE with a desire to explore MP innovations.
>
>
> The question is perhaps, why is this desire for innovation not expressed for JAX-RS, CDI, JSON, ... on which MP depends?
>
> For those specs MP is seemingly happy with the pace of innovation that's (expected) in Jakarta EE. Why wouldn't this hold for mature and by now stable specs like Config?
>
> Or put differently, do we expect wild and huge incompatible changes in Config any time soon?
>
> Kind regards,
> Arjan
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jakarta.ee-community mailing list
> jakarta.ee-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-community
