Re: [jakarta.ee-community] Fork Eclipse MicroProfile Configuration as Ja

[Werner Keil <werner.keil@xxxxxxxxx>]

I put it on the agenda of today's Spec Committee call (not as an April Fool's Joke ;-D) 

Let's see what others think why it could be necessary and how vendors might cope that use MP right now?

As per definition it won't be relevant before Jakarta EE 10 anyway, but if such a spec had to be created or "graduated" from MP it should be done sooner.

Werner

On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 4:49 PM Heiko W. Rupp <hrupp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 1 Apr 2020, at 16:34, Otavio Santana wrote:


> My question is: Does it make sense if we create a fork of Eclipse
> MicroProfile Configuration as Jakarta Configuration?

That is a nice Aprils fool of you :-)

> The project seems stable and it will valuable to several projects such
> as JPA, JMS, and NoSQL.

Is(n't) the main obstacle of just including it that MicroProfile does
not have the IP
protection has, as it does not use the Eclipse Spec Process? If so, I
guess just
waiting on that Process to be used may be as good/quick as a fork and
would
prevent the two from drifting apart. Or that contributors have to
constantly
submit changes to two projects.

But I am sure I am missing some things

   Heiko

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-community mailing list
jakarta.ee-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-community