Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [] Fork Eclipse MicroProfile Configuration as Jakarta Configuration.

Hi Otavio,

Thanks for the suggestion. Will try to raise it in the Spec Committee to see, what others think.
Technically it may not be a big issue and the license also won't permit it, but as long as vendors already baked MP Config into some of their products (IBM, Red Hat and I believe even TomEE could use it somewhere) it requires some care if it's even a necessary step.

Why would you consider changing it, only for the namespace?



On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 4:35 PM Otavio Santana <otaviopolianasantana@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello everyone, I sent this discussion about the total integration of MicroProfile and Jakarta and I understood that it is not possible.

My question is: Does it make sense if we create a fork of Eclipse MicroProfile Configuration as Jakarta Configuration?
The project seems stable and it will valuable to several projects such as JPA, JMS, and NoSQL.
I wrote a draft proposal about it, please, let me know what do you think about it.

Otávio Santana
_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe from this list, visit

Back to the top