I have to wholeheartedly agree. Even if there is a legitimate issue, this is not the optimal way of approaching it. Even when asked, Romain has persistently refused to engage a bit more closely.
In general I believe what is established for Jakarta EE is the right thing, especially in the long term. For example, I am not happy that I cannot be an individual commiter, but I wholly understand and respect why that is the case. Multiple folks from the Eclipse Foundation have been very generous in explaining the reasons, as did the JCP staff for Java EE.
Jakarta EE Ambassador, Author, Speaker, Blogger
Please note views expressed here are my own as an individual community member and do not reflect the views of my employer.
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
Romain is entitled
to his opinion, but I don't agree with it.
-------- Original message --------
From: Kevin Sutter <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 1/28/20 3:04 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: Jakarta EE community discussions <jakarta.ee-community@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [jakarta.ee-community] [Open Feedback] to this Community via Twitter
I belong to and
have participated in both foundations -- Eclipse and Apache. Yes,
they are different. They both have quirks. But, I do not agree
with posting something like this and asking for a discussion. At
least not on the Jakarta EE Community forum. We should focus on Jakarta
EE issues and questions, and not opinions about the Eclipse Foundation.
My two cents worth...
STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE architect @ IBM
e-mail: sutter@xxxxxxxxxx Twitter: @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)
EE Community <jakarta.ee-community@xxxxxxxxxxx>
[jakarta.ee-community] [Open Feedback] to this Community via Twitter
Hello from Las Vegas
with reference to
If Romain's statements
are true, why are they true?
jakarta.ee-community mailing list
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit