Re: [iot-wg] Why use concierge?

[Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx>]

What do we mean by "optimised"? Couldn't we not go through and do that optimization to address the size of Equinox? Or are there big architectural differences that makes it harder to do with Equinox?

(BTW, had the same question since I heard of Concierge).

On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Thomas Eichstädt-Engelen <te@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Pascal,

if “size” is equal to “resources” than this the argument for Eclipse SmartHome for example. Since Equinox is not really “optimised" for low budget embedded devices (like Raspberry Pi) Concierge seems to be a promising approach.

Best, Thomas E.-E.

On 23 Apr 2014, at 18:19, Pascal Rapicault <pascal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Since Concierge has been released, I noticed a lot of interest from the variou IoT projects to move to concierge from Equinox and I would like to understand the motivation of such a move? I can obviously get the size argument, but is there more to it?
>
> Thanks
>
> Pascal
> _______________________________________________
> iot-wg mailing list
> iot-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg

_______________________________________________
iot-wg mailing list
iot-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg