[
Date Prev][Date Next][
Thread Prev][Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [incubation] Additional GitHub Repos
|
Sorry - to be clear - about the incubation status of Milo itself. Perhaps calling some of the modules "incubating" is a confusing overload of terms.
I'm not trying to imply anything about incubation status with the name of the repository. Just trying to clean up.
Typically incubation is implied by the version being < 1.0 not by the
name of the repository. Of course you can name your repositories how
you wish and there are projecst with "permanent incubator" repositories.
On 10.04.2025 17:02, Kevin Herron via incubation wrote:
> Recently I completed the move to a project-specific org on GitHub
> (e.g. i.e. `eclipse/milo` became `eclipse-milo/milo`).
>
> Now I'm preparing for a long overdue 1.0 release and looking to move
> some of the modules in my project to separate incubating or deprecated
> repositories (i.e. create `eclipse-milo/milo-incubating` and
> `eclipse-milo/milo-deprecated` repositories).
>
> Is this a pattern that other projects have used before? Are there any
> objections to this? Is this just a simple help desk request? Am I even
> asking in the right place? :)
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin
>
> _______________________________________________
> incubation mailing list
> incubation@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
_______________________________________________
incubation mailing list
incubation@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
