[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [incubation] Additional GitHub Repos
|
I'm not trying to imply anything about incubation status with the name of the repository. Just trying to clean up.
Typically incubation is implied by the version being < 1.0 not by the
name of the repository. Of course you can name your repositories how
you wish and there are projecst with "permanent incubator" repositories.
On 10.04.2025 17:02, Kevin Herron via incubation wrote:
> Recently I completed the move to a project-specific org on GitHub
> (e.g. i.e. `eclipse/milo` became `eclipse-milo/milo`).
>
> Now I'm preparing for a long overdue 1.0 release and looking to move
> some of the modules in my project to separate incubating or deprecated
> repositories (i.e. create `eclipse-milo/milo-incubating` and
> `eclipse-milo/milo-deprecated` repositories).
>
> Is this a pattern that other projects have used before? Are there any
> objections to this? Is this just a simple help desk request? Am I even
> asking in the right place? :)
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin
>
> _______________________________________________
> incubation mailing list
> incubation@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
_______________________________________________
incubation mailing list
incubation@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
