Re: [incubation] License compatibility for SISSL and EPL : changed to :

[Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes. Use the package name space that makes the best technical sense.

However... please ensure that the package name does not infringe on trademarks held by others or that you follow the the rules established for their use.

Also... bear in mind that I will completely forget that the conversation occurred and at some point in the future (likely when you're asking me to review an IP Log) I will almost certainly ask you about the package name (we really need to come up with a way to track this sort of thing).

It's a good idea to just let the PMC know that you're doing this. They shouldn't push back, but it's good for them to know.

Wayne

So now the issue has potentially changed into : can I deliver an API with a predefined (non-eclipse) namespace as part of Triquetrum?
More concretely, the package name should be org.ggf.drmaa for the interfaces/API.

--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation