|Re: [ide-dev] [ui-best-practices-working-group] Working sets (WAS: Re: Java IDEs comparison)|
From: <ide-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Discussions about the IDE <ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, September 30, 2016 at 12:45 PM
To: "ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ide-dev] [ui-best-practices-working-group] Working sets (WAS: Re: Java IDEs comparison)
If it’s easy to integrate with, I don’t see an issue of doing this for CDT.
BTW, +1 on Open Resources. Use it quite often, especially in C++ land since there often isn’t a 1-1 relationship of type with file. But that also make Open Type more important when looking for things. And CDT does do methods and functions amongst a few other things.
Should really start putting together a roadmap so we don’t lose track of all these things. Maybe we can start that in Ludwigsburg.
Back to the top