Re: [ide-dev] Dropping the release names (Neon, Oxygen) from user downloads
The proposals are IMHO better than our current naming schema.
Sounds like most of us the following two alternatives:
I personally vote for variant 1, I also belong into the camp which did
not decode the Ubuntu naming schema for a very long time. So at least
Mickael and I got confused by that.
Who will bring the proposal to change the naming schema forward to the
planning council (assuming the planning council is responsible)?
Best regards, Lars
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Bruno Medeiros
> On 29 April 2016 at 09:58, Lars Vogel <lars.vogel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Gunnar, Platform may also change their policy over time so you should not
>> pick a schema that assumes Platform will forever work like today
> I'm with Gunnar on this one. If the release structure/rhythm changes, we can
> always change the versioning again to better suit the new release structure.
> But not the other way around, we shouldn't change to a versioning scheme
> that doesn't suit the current release structure. Your suggestion of having a
> real date like "16.10" makes it totally unclear if it is a major release or
> a minor one.
> Bruno Medeiros
> ide-dev mailing list
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
> this list, visit
Eclipse Platform UI and e4 project co-lead
CEO vogella GmbH
Haindaalwisch 17a, 22395 Hamburg
Amtsgericht Hamburg: HRB 127058
Geschäftsführer: Lars Vogel, Jennifer Nerlich de Vogel
Fax (040) 5247 6322, Email: lars.vogel@xxxxxxxxxxx, Web: http://www.vogella.com