Behalf Of Markus Sabadello
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007
(Trust Framework) Project developer discussions
Subject: Re: [higgins-dev] new
Hmm I don't know enough about the use cases to have an opinion about this. Has
anyone ever used different context factories for the same context?
The current proposal does support associating a context with a single or
multiple context factories (via the context type), but as you say it does not
really "remember" which one was used. However, due to the
"priority" attributes in XRDS, one can predict which one the registry
On 8/6/07, Greg Byrd
When we first discussed the registry, a few F2F's ago, there was a
notion that the registry would hold a binding of a context and a
particular context factory. Different factories might allow
operations/views of a given context, so it's important for a user to
keep using the same factory in order to get a consistent experience.
I don't see anything in the current proposal that supports this. Do
still believe that it's needed? Do we believe that different
will indeed have different behaviors? (Even if this behavior is
such as different ways of updating attributes, it might be confusing if
the user sees differences.)
Markus Sabadello wrote:
> Hi all,
> Since I didn't get much feedback about the new XRI/XRDS based
> IdASRegistry, I am wondering if you guys (especially Jim and people
> working on Context Providers) had a chance to look at it.
> I would like to check it in soon so we can get this running, and it
> will definitely break a few things. The changes will include replacing
> ContextRefs with ContextIds in the IContextFactory interface.
> The relevant Wiki pages are:
> If noone objects I propose to commit this in a few days.. Let me know
> if I can help with anything.
> higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev mailing list