Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [henshin-user] Problem with type of parameters in units

Hello Pierre-Yves,

this problem sounds familiar: in the recent nightly build, we fixed some bugs related to the parameter flow validation. Are you using the nightly build version, or an earlier release?

Best regards,

Am 13.12.2017 um 11:41 schrieb Pierre-Yves Schmerber:

Hello Henshin users,

I have a question about parameter type declaration in units:

When I have a sequential unit that calls only rules, I can declare a var parameter X in the unit that is declared as output of the first rule the first rule, and as an input of the second rule. However, when I replace the second rule by a unit that calls itself the second rule, and I declare the X parameter as an input to this called unit, the validation raises an error on the top unit as in parameters may only be mapped to in, inout or unknown parameters.

How shall I declare the X parameter on the second rule to prevent this validation error (that has no impact on the transformation execution) ?

Note: I have a similar problem for  out parameters when I replace the first rule by a unit.


Best regards,


         Pierre-Yves Schmerber

henshin-user mailing list
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit

Back to the top