| Re: [handly-dev] no non-static embedded classes |
Hi!It's not a big problem, but a bit annoying. I can survive until Xtend implements it.regards,Vlad
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Vladimir Piskarev <pisv@xxxxx> wrote:
Hi Vlad,Several concerns here:* This looks, indeed, rather artificial and will produce artificially-looking results.* This will break existing clients without any obvious present or future benefits for them.* This will introduce a design restriction that needs to be kept in mind, and is easy to overlook.How badly are you affected by this? Any chance it could be eventually addressed by Xtend?I remain open to discussion, but -1 would be my first response, sorry.Best regards,VladimirHi!This request is an artifact of my tooling and I will understand if it's not accepted.Would it be possible to get rid of any nested non-static classes in the implementation (those that might be extended by clients)? At the moment I only know of SourceFile.ReconcileOperation. The implicit SourceFile.this can be sent as a constructor parameter and stored in a field.best regards,Vlad
_______________________________________________
handly-dev mailing list
handly-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/handly-dev