Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [glassfish-dev] GlassFish 6.0.0 release still on track?

Has anybody raised the request to be listed as a compatible implementation Jakarta EE 9?

 

From: glassfish-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx <glassfish-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of arjan tijms
Sent: 07 January 2021 14:05
To: Alwin Joseph <alwin.joseph@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: glassfish developer discussions <glassfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [glassfish-dev] GlassFish 6.0.0 release still on track?

 

Awesome, thanks! 

 

On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 2:59 PM Alwin Joseph <alwin.joseph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Ed/Arjan,

I also ran the cdi, di & bv porting kits against the glassfish which passed the tests as well.

Just in case if the test result is required for recording here is the job url https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/standalonetck-certification/95/ .

Thanks & Regards,
Alwin Joseph

On 01/01/21 2:19 am, arjan tijms wrote:

Awesome, thanks! 

 

On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 6:48 PM Ed Bratt <ed.bratt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Site pages are pushed and built. If you notice any problems, please let me know.

-- Ed

On 12/30/2020 2:42 AM, arjan tijms wrote:

Hi,

 

The jobs are done, and they all passed.

 

Kind regards,

Arjan

 

On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 11:08 PM arjan tijms <arjan.tijms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 

On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 10:46 PM Edward Bratt <ed.bratt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

If the results are all ready, I can finish up the download and certification pages. I will check the latest results in a bit but if you want to point me at the latest test jobs, I won't have to hunt as much...

-- Ed

 

On 12/29/2020 9:49 AM, arjan tijms wrote:

Hi,

 

On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 3:15 PM Steve Millidge (Payara) <steve.millidge@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

OK let’s release RC4 then spin a 6.0.0 into staging and rerun the TCKs on the 6.0.0 staged binary.

 

I just did all of that ;) TCKs are running again. 

 

If all passes again, shall we release the final on 31 December? I can do pretty much everything I think.

 

Kind regards,

Arjan

 

 

 

 

I don’t have a lot of bandwidth this week to help on a final release.

 

 

From: glassfish-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx <glassfish-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of arjan tijms
Sent: 29 December 2020 14:08
To: glassfish developer discussions <glassfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [glassfish-dev] GlassFish 6.0.0 release still on track?

 

Hi,

 

RC4 was only staged, and then subsequently used to run the TCKs against. It wasn't released to Maven Central.

 

HK2 3.0.1 has indeed been released to Maven Central.

 

Kind regards,

Arjan Tijms

 

 

 

On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 3:00 PM Steve Millidge (Payara) <steve.millidge@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Have we released RC4 to maven central etc. and the new HK2 3.0.1?

 

From: glassfish-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx <glassfish-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of arjan tijms
Sent: 29 December 2020 12:06
To: glassfish developer discussions <glassfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [glassfish-dev] GlassFish 6.0.0 release still on track?

 

Hi,

 

After incorporating the latest fixes for HK, and staging a RC4, everything is now nice and green.

 

 

 

Shall we restage 6.0.0-RC4 as 6.0.0 and release?

 

Kind regards,

Arjan Tijms

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 6:36 PM arjan tijms <arjan.tijms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

 

On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 5:21 PM <Hussain.NM@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Can you consider including the below PR for 3.0.1. This updates some of the dependencies to its latest version.

 

https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/glassfish-hk2/pull/539

 

Running the tests for 3.0.1 (as part of the build), it doesn't seem it really likes the new ASM version:

 

17:50:17  [ERROR] testProxiedSingletonInContextUsingProxyCtl(org.glassfish.hk2.tests.locator.proxiable2.ProxiableTest)  Time elapsed: 0.001 s  <<< ERROR!

17:50:17  MultiException stack 1 of 2

17:50:17  java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class javassist.util.proxy.SecurityActions

17:50:17   at javassist.util.proxy.ProxyFactory.getMethods(ProxyFactory.java:1294)

17:50:17   at javassist.util.proxy.ProxyFactory.getMethods(ProxyFactory.java:1269)

17:50:17   at javassist.util.proxy.ProxyFactory.makeSortedMethodList(ProxyFactory.java:991)

17:50:17   at javassist.util.proxy.ProxyFactory.computeSignature(ProxyFactory.java:998)

17:50:17   at javassist.util.proxy.ProxyFactory.createClass(ProxyFactory.java:479)

17:50:17   at org.jvnet.hk2.internal.ProxyUtilities$4.run(ProxyUtilities.java:147)

17:50:17   at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)

17:50:17   at org.jvnet.hk2.internal.ProxyUtilities.secureCreate(ProxyUtilities.java:127)

17:50:17   at org.jvnet.hk2.internal.ProxyUtilities.generateProxy(ProxyUtilities.java:193)

17:50:17   at org.jvnet.hk2.internal.Utilities.createService(Utilities.java:2075)

17:50:17   at org.jvnet.hk2.internal.ServiceHandleImpl.getService(ServiceHandleImpl.java:93)

17:50:17   at org.jvnet.hk2.internal.ServiceHandleImpl.getService(ServiceHandleImpl.java:67)

17:50:17   at org.glassfish.hk2.tests.locator.proxiable2.ProxiableTest.testProxiedSingletonInContextUsingProxyCtl(ProxiableTest.java:108)

17:50:17   at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)

17:50:17   at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)

17:50:17   at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)

17:50:17   at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)

17:50:17   at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)

17:50:17   at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)

17:50:17   at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)

17:50:17   at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)

17:50:17   at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)

17:50:17   at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)

17:50:17   at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)

17:50:17   at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)

17:50:17   at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)

17:50:17   at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)

17:50:17   at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)

17:50:17   at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)

17:50:17   at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)

17:50:17   at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)

17:50:17   at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)

17:50:17   at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)

17:50:17   at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:365)

17:50:17   at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:273)

17:50:17   at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:238)

17:50:17   at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:159)

17:50:17   at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:384)

17:50:17   at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:345)

17:50:17   at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:126)

17:50:17   at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:418)

 

Kind regards,

Arjan

 

 

We should probably assume though that we're indeed not going to release 6.0.0 tomorrow, so that's a small failure. But it should not be terrible as we do have the RC out.

 

Kind regards,

Arjan

 

 

 

On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 5:27 PM Steve Millidge (Payara) <steve.millidge@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

To do that you will have to make a PR to add the JBoss repo into the GlassFish poms. I’m not sure we should build a final for staging based on that change?

 

From: arjan tijms <arjan.tijms@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 07 December 2020 16:20
To: Steve Millidge (Payara) <steve.millidge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Guillaume Smet <guillaume.smet@xxxxxxxxx>; glassfish developer discussions <glassfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Scott Stark <sstark@xxxxxxxxxx>; Scott Marlow <smarlow@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [glassfish-dev] GlassFish 6.0.0 release still on track?

 

Hi,

 

To release to central all dependencies should be in central indeed, but using the JBoss staging repo we can at least start running the TCK. I'm also not sure whether we make it in time, it would have been a whole lot better if we had CR1 last friday, but it is what it is.

 

Kind regards,

Arjan

 

 

 

On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 4:58 PM Steve Millidge (Payara) <steve.millidge@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I think we need to get into central so that source is buildable by anyone before we stage a release. Once there we can build a staged 6.0.0 to run the TCK against.

 

Personally I don’t think we will make it in time for tomorrow as the TCK will take a while to run but 6.0.0 can be staged tomorrow.

 

Steve

 

From: arjan tijms <arjan.tijms@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 07 December 2020 15:45
To: Guillaume Smet <guillaume.smet@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Steve Millidge (Payara) <steve.millidge@xxxxxxxxxxx>; glassfish developer discussions <glassfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Scott Stark <sstark@xxxxxxxxxx>; Scott Marlow <smarlow@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [glassfish-dev] GlassFish 6.0.0 release still on track?

 

Hi,

 

Thanks! That's the same as my Amsterdam time ;) 

 

Steve and others, what do you think, do a release of GF 6.0 during/just before the livestream then? 

 

Meanwhile, if CR1 available in a staging repo so we can run the TCK with that?

 

Kind regards,

Arjan

 

_______________________________________________
glassfish-dev mailing list
glassfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/glassfish-dev

_______________________________________________
glassfish-dev mailing list
glassfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/glassfish-dev

 

_______________________________________________
glassfish-dev mailing list
glassfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/glassfish-dev__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!KKvuDywl2E7mJhAYLJmdDmWSruZHBDH0MTxzQWwmiDm3TS3qlFSuv7-HFWLVgGA$

 

_______________________________________________
glassfish-dev mailing list
glassfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/glassfish-dev__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!KIF5K2WSRkBIjgT_jMA2eMk1g1z_heUCAz-RO7W5lJZeSpFCrCMj_jW47V6iCG4mFA$

Back to the top