Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [geowave-dev] [locationtech-pmc] LocationTech GeoWave Status Update
Hi everyone,

Thanks for all the additional context and feedback.
Given the information shared in this thread, I propose that we change the planned Termination Review into a Progress Review.

There is clearly continued interest in keeping GeoWave at the Eclipse Foundation, and the project remains important to downstream users. At the same time, the Progress Review would give us an opportunity to formally assess the current state of the project and agree on what needs to happen to keep it in good standing.

In particular, there are a few items that we should address as part of that process:
  • The project team needs to engage in the IP Due Diligence Process for its dependencies. There is already an open issue tracking this: https://github.com/locationtech/geowave/issues/1920. The initial analysis found almost 900 compile dependencies, with almost 200 potentially requiring review by the Eclipse IP Team, although the project team still needs to validate the dependency list and results.
  • We should confirm that there are active committers/maintainers who are willing to engage with the Foundation and take responsibility for the actions identified during the review.
  • We should also verify the project activity information shown on the PMI page, as the current activity indication may not accurately reflect recent development.
I think this gives us a reasonable path forward: rather than terminating the project now, the Progress Review can establish the project's actual status, confirm that there is a team willing to maintain it, and identify the concrete actions required for GeoWave to remain an active Eclipse Foundation project.

If there are no objections, I suggest we proceed with a Progress Review on that basis.
Kind regards, 
Maria Teresa

On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 7:37 PM Whitney O'Meara <james.w.omeara@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hey everyone,

Adding another data point in favor of keeping the project active:

GeoWave continues to be a core foundational component for external open-source architectures, notably DataWave (https://github.com/NationalSecurityAgency/datawave), which relies heavily on it for geospatial indexing, query, and analytics.

Even though there hasn't been a major upstream release recently, the codebase remains integral to active downstream development and workflows. A Termination Review feels premature given how heavily it is still utilized.

I agree with Rich's assessment and would support maintaining active status rather than termination.

Thanks,
Whitney O'Meara

On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 1:06 PM Rich Fecher via geowave-dev <geowave-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Thanks, Johnathan. I share your concern.

GeoWave has not had a significant upstream release in several years, and restarting the release process would likely require some effort. However, it remains actively used, and more specific development has continued around this generic capability. Often it's been pragmatic to develop specific operational needs rather than generalizing for the broader library, but it nevertheless demonstrates that the codebase is still relevant and continuing to evolve.

Given that, I believe a termination review may be premature. Before proceeding, could the EMO or PMC clarify whether termination would prevent the community from later maintaining and publishing GeoWave releases from another public repository, particularly given the GeoWave name and associated Eclipse Foundation IP?

If termination would create such a barrier, then maintaining the project’s active status seems appropriate.

Rich

On Fri, Aug 14, 2026, 11:11 AM Johnathan Garrett via locationtech-pmc <locationtech-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello,
I just wanted to offer my two cents here.  GeoWave is actively used and is critical to operations for organizations that I support and also other organizations that I know of. I know it’s not being actively updated at the moment but from what I understand, that’s due to feature/resource prioritization as opposed to being a dead project.

Thanks,
- Johnathan Garrett

On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 2:16 AM A Huarte via geowave-dev <geowave-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi again, 

I apologize; I didn't express myself clearly in my previous message.

GeoWave has been a spectacular tool, but since it appears not to have been maintained for several years, I believe it should be included in the termination review and the actions resulting from that decision—not simply deleted. The tool and the efforts of the development team deserve a round of applause and immense gratitude from the community.

Thanks and regards.

Regards
Alvaro


En miércoles, 12 de agosto de 2026, 00:01:51 CEST, <ahuarte47@xxxxxxxx> escribió:



Hi Carmen, thanks for this notification.
Yes, you are right, this project is not maintained from years.


I agree the project is ready for termination review and it should be removed.

Thanks a lot to everyone
Best regards

Álvaro

En martes, 11 de agosto de 2026, 15:25:01 CEST, Eclipse Management Office EMO via geowave-dev <geowave-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> escribió:


Dear Project Team and Dev Community, 

Can you confirm the current status of LocationTech GeoWave https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/locationtech.geowave?

Based on the PMI page, the last release was done in 2021, and the last activity was last year. Would you like to run a progress review, or is the project ready for a Termination Review?

Thanks in advance, 

Carmen Delgado

--
The Eclipse Management Organization | Eclipse Foundation

The Eclipse Project Handbook contains a lot of useful information for Eclipse committers.
_______________________________________________
geowave-dev mailing list
geowave-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/geowave-dev
_______________________________________________
geowave-dev mailing list
geowave-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/geowave-dev
_______________________________________________
locationtech-pmc mailing list
locationtech-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/locationtech-pmc
_______________________________________________
geowave-dev mailing list
geowave-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/geowave-dev


--
The Eclipse Management Organization | Eclipse Foundation

The Eclipse Project Handbook contains a lot of useful information for Eclipse committers.

Back to the top