Re: [europa-build-workshop] CBI

[Andrew Overholt <overholt@xxxxxxxxxx>]

* Pete Mackie <pete@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [2006-11-28 17:28]:
> Flash is free and so are the development tools. Why does it need
> to be open source?

Do I really need to answer this?

> I guess I don't understand what common enough complete
> enough means? Flash is on 98% of all PCs. As for complete,
> what features are lacking that we would need?

If you don't care that it isn't OSS, how about the fact that the binaries
they release aren't available for such platforms as Linux PPC?

I just don't see how we can build a supposedly open source build system
while locking ourselves into proprietary technology.  But perhaps that's
just me ...

Andrew

Attachment: pgpIGwKZk2gxz.pgp
Description: PGP signature